Research paper on an ethic author
Resources Elsevier has constructed a brochure and a number of individual factsheets on the topics covered on this page. If the explanation is not satisfactory we will reject the submission.
Present a precise and accurate account of the research performed and a clear, objective discussion of its significance.
Any technical manipulation by the author should be notified in the cover letter to the Journal Editor upon submission. AGU journals use plagiarism detection software from iThenticate upon submission to identify any such duplication.
Research paper on an ethic author
At this time it will be completely free to view and download for all. You may want to write an editorial or take this chance to update guidance for authors, especially if clearer guidelines may have prevented the problem. In signing a Publishing Agreement, the Corresponding Author warrants that: All named co-authors have authorized her or him to act as an agent on their behalf. Authors may have contributed in multiple roles. Multiple, redundant or concurrent publication: An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Think about appointing an editorial board member who has a permanent role in investigating ethical issues. In such cases, the Corresponding Author must confirm that the co-author has agreed to do so, and in doing so retains her or his right to be named as a co-author. Find out how we host it, and make it more discoverable. Some journals request that you upload raw data as a supplemental file for publication you can check the instruction for authors to see if this is the case on the journal you are submitting to. LaTeX files are also accepted. Figures supplied in colour will appear in colour online regardless of whether or not these illustrations are reproduced in colour in the printed version. Information obtained privately, as in conversation or correspondence, should not be used or reported without explicit permission from the source.
They can do this in their cover letter, or by answering a conflict of interest question on the peer review systems submission form. Acknowledgement of sources: Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given.
Top It should be noted there are two distinct situations: serious scientific fraud or errors.
Who should be an author on a scientific paper
These might prove useful when working on your article:. At this stage please ensure you have included all the required statements and declarations and uploaded any additional supplementary files including reporting guidelines where relevant. Proofs will be sent by PDF to the corresponding author and should be returned promptly. All coauthors share responsibility for the quality and integrity of the submitted and published manuscript. As you write and review manuscripts, remember the best practices found in this white paper , and consider ways to bring authorship credit and accountability to the attention of your colleagues and readers. Information obtained privately, as in conversation or correspondence, should not be used or reported without explicit permission from the source. Always provide appropriate citation. As a result, authors may share fame or infamy, depending on the validity of the work. Five steps to follow when encountering possible misconduct: Remain a neutral player and treat all potential misconduct cases confidentially Keep records of written communication including the allegation and the evidence of the complainant Raise the issue with the accused co- author in a timely manner Assess what exactly has happened fact finding and be transparent and final about decisions In case of potential media attention e. Case 4: Conflicts of interest It is very important to be honest about any conflicts of interest, whether sources of research funding, direct or indirect financial support, supply of equipment or materials, or other support.
A conflict of interest describes a situation in which an author or author group have potential competing interests, be it professional or financial, in the submission and publication of their paper and its research.
Honorary authorship Honorary authorship is given to an individual despite a lack of substantial contributions to a research project. Some have also suggested the establishment of a database or the use of existing research community networks such as ResearchGate to track contributions.
Per these guidelines, scientific research, and the preparation of the results, must be free of any impropriety or undisclosed conflicts of interest.
based on 94 review