Since the initial escalation, Hamas and other Palestinian militants launched more than 2, rockets into Israel with longer ranges than in past conflicts, and Israel conducted more than 4, air strikes on various targets in Gaza Zanotti,p.
The American Interest.
La Plata: Ediciones Terramar. International Security, 30 3 There are local-level politics that no amount of airpower effects, kinetic or non-kinetic, can supplant or overcome.
These threats include states using asymmetrical tactics and nonstate actors conforming transnational terrorism organizations, creating a wide range of security challenges that air supremacy must counter through adaptation and innovation.
Based on these circumstances, over the past years Israel has conducted several military campaigns like Operations Cast Lead, Pillar of Defense and Protective Edge among others, in order to disrupt and deter Gaza-based militant groups including Hamas.
According to Cohen and Scheinmann : Despite Israel's clear technological edge, air superiority and notable intelligence capacity, it could not accomplish all of its objectives through air power alone.
Only those factories which were useful for war production were moved because of the total war commitment of the Soviet government. These advantages reflected a military supremacy in traditional wars between states, evidenced in the international system.